Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit e340dfe1 authored by Benjamin Hättasch's avatar Benjamin Hättasch
Browse files

Enhance robustness by deactivating print statements in cv signal receivers

parent ea1401be
No related branches found
No related tags found
1 merge request!132Make scheduling preparation easier
Hide whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
Showing
with 14 additions and 14 deletions
AKScheduling/models.py
+ 14
− 14
View file @ e340dfe1
......@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ def ak_owners_changed_handler(sender, instance: AK, action: str, **kwargs):
c.ak_slots_tmp.add(other_slot)
new_violations.append(c)
print(f"{owner} has the following conflicts: {new_violations}")
#print(f"{owner} has the following conflicts: {new_violations}")
# ... and compare to/update list of existing violations of this type
# belonging to the AK that was recently changed (important!)
......@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ def ak_conflicts_changed_handler(sender, instance: AK, action: str, **kwargs):
c.ak_slots_tmp.add(other_slot)
new_violations.append(c)
print(f"{instance} has the following conflicts: {new_violations}")
# print(f"{instance} has the following conflicts: {new_violations}")
# ... and compare to/update list of existing violations of this type
# belonging to the AK that was recently changed (important!)
......@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ def ak_prerequisites_changed_handler(sender, instance: AK, action: str, **kwargs
c.ak_slots_tmp.add(other_slot)
new_violations.append(c)
print(f"{instance} has the following conflicts: {new_violations}")
# print(f"{instance} has the following conflicts: {new_violations}")
# ... and compare to/update list of existing violations of this type
# belonging to the AK that was recently changed (important!)
......@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ def ak_requirements_changed_handler(sender, instance: AK, action: str, **kwargs)
c.ak_slots_tmp.add(slot)
new_violations.append(c)
print(f"{instance} has the following conflicts: {new_violations}")
# print(f"{instance} has the following conflicts: {new_violations}")
# ... and compare to/update list of existing violations of this type
# belonging to the AK that was recently changed (important!)
......@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ def ak_requirements_changed_handler(sender, instance: AK, action: str, **kwargs)
@receiver(post_save, sender=AKSlot)
def akslot_changed_handler(sender, instance: AKSlot, **kwargs):
# Changes might affect: Duplicate parallel, Two in room, Resodeadline
print(f"{sender} changed")
# print(f"{sender} changed")
event = instance.event
# == Check for two parallel slots by one of the owners ==
......@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ def akslot_changed_handler(sender, instance: AKSlot, **kwargs):
c.ak_slots_tmp.add(other_slot)
new_violations.append(c)
print(f"{owner} has the following conflicts: {new_violations}")
# print(f"{owner} has the following conflicts: {new_violations}")
# ... and compare to/update list of existing violations of this type
# belonging to the AK that was recently changed (important!)
......@@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ def akslot_changed_handler(sender, instance: AKSlot, **kwargs):
c.ak_slots_tmp.add(other_slot)
new_violations.append(c)
print(f"Multiple slots in room {instance.room}: {new_violations}")
# print(f"Multiple slots in room {instance.room}: {new_violations}")
# ... and compare to/update list of existing violations of this type
# belonging to the slot that was recently changed (important!)
......@@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ def akslot_changed_handler(sender, instance: AKSlot, **kwargs):
c.ak_slots_tmp.add(instance)
new_violations.append(c)
print(f"{instance.ak} has the following slots outside availabilities: {new_violations}")
# print(f"{instance.ak} has the following slots outside availabilities: {new_violations}")
# ... and compare to/update list of existing violations of this type
# belonging to the AK that was recently changed (important!)
......@@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ def akslot_changed_handler(sender, instance: AKSlot, **kwargs):
c.ak_slots_tmp.add(instance)
new_violations.append(c)
print(f"{instance} has the following conflicts: {new_violations}")
# print(f"{instance} has the following conflicts: {new_violations}")
# ... and compare to/update list of existing violations of this type
# belonging to the AK that was recently changed (important!)
......@@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ def akslot_changed_handler(sender, instance: AKSlot, **kwargs):
c.ak_slots_tmp.add(other_slot)
new_violations.append(c)
print(f"{instance} has the following conflicts: {new_violations}")
# print(f"{instance} has the following conflicts: {new_violations}")
# ... and compare to/update list of existing violations of this type
# belonging to the AK that was recently changed (important!)
......@@ -534,7 +534,7 @@ def akslot_changed_handler(sender, instance: AKSlot, **kwargs):
c.ak_slots_tmp.add(other_slot)
new_violations.append(c)
print(f"{instance} has the following conflicts: {new_violations}")
# print(f"{instance} has the following conflicts: {new_violations}")
# ... and compare to/update list of existing violations of this type
# belonging to the AK that was recently changed (important!)
......@@ -556,7 +556,7 @@ def akslot_deleted_handler(sender, instance: AKSlot, **kwargs):
# Manually clean up or remove constraint violations that belong to this slot since there is no cascade deletion
# for many2many relationships. Explicitly listening for AK deletion signals is not necessary since they will
# transitively trigger this signal and we always set both AK and AKSlot references in a constraint violation
print(f"{instance} deleted")
# print(f"{instance} deleted")
for cv in instance.constraintviolation_set.all():
# Make sure not delete CVs that e.g., show three parallel slots in a single room
......@@ -599,7 +599,7 @@ def room_requirements_changed_handler(sender, instance: Room, action: str, **kwa
@receiver(post_save, sender=Availability)
def availability_changed_handler(sender, instance: Availability, **kwargs):
# Changes might affect: category availability, AK availability, Room availability
print(f"{instance} changed")
# print(f"{instance} changed")
event = instance.event
......@@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ def availability_changed_handler(sender, instance: Availability, **kwargs):
c.ak_slots_tmp.add(slot)
new_violations.append(c)
print(f"{instance.ak} has the following slots outside availabilities: {new_violations}")
# print(f"{instance.ak} has the following slots outside availabilities: {new_violations}")
# ... and compare to/update list of existing violations of this type
# belonging to the AK that was recently changed (important!)
......
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment